![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
![]() |
MLE help
Hey guys, I've a Linear Models assignment due in 3 weeks. Really appreciate some help in certain area(s).
Here's the first part: I'll explain the experiment, You are counting salmon for K days. You have a perfect detector for first n days and an imperfect detector K-n days. Imperfect detects fish with probability p. Assume: perfect detector is used for the first n days and the imperfect detector for the next K-n days and that m1 and m2 salmon are detected during those periods, respectively. 1•.Show carefully that the MLE for (, p) is given by ˆ=m1/n, pˆ= m2n/m1(K-n), in the case where m2n/m1(K-n) is less than or equal to 1. 2. Find the MLE for (, p) when this latter condition is not satisfied. ((''''' note: m1 and m2 here are m subscript 1 and m subscript 2 respectively. I’m not sure how to type them properly in ‘Word’.'''''')) and also the squares are obviously ''lambda''. The next part is a covariance matrix problem. I have the answers for the above and I have worked out a way to get them, but I'm not entirely sure if my ways are correct. I'm presuming, the Liklihood is poisson(lambda) x poisson(plambda).?? Any help would be great, cheers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
TS Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens , Greece
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
![]() |
You pressumed right! Nothing to be afraid of...
__________________
> http://statsravingmad.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
![]() |
Well, that's good news.
However, to estimate lambda^, I just use the poisson(lambda). and to estimate p^, I just use the poisson(plambda). This is what I used and got the answer that the question says. I admit, I worked backwards basically. Joining the two together did not give me the correct answer? Would I be correct in saying this? Last edited by allinorfold; 11-02-2009 at 03:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
![]() |
Sorry, I should stress that I used
L(lambda) is proportional to lambda^(m1) x e^(-nlambda) to estimate lambda^. (and similar for plambda.) replacing m1 with m2, lambda with plambda, and n with (K-n). This is the Poisson dist for i.i.d. r.v.'s I believe?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
![]() |
For the record,
it was distributed poisson(lambda x n) and poisson(lambda x p x (k-n)) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Statistics Homework Help - Full Time Trader - Work At Home - Priceline Winning Bids |