Dear all,
At the moment, I'm trying to do a 'Nested Anova'. I have several years (2004 to 2012) and four seasons. So a nested anova is called for correct?
I'm looking at carcass data. My dataset consists of the amount of carcasses found every 10 days. There are a lot of zero values, as I expect higher mortality (at the end) in certain seasons. Anova compares the means of each group, but I think that the 'mean found carcasses' is not really suitable (especially because of the many zero values). I would rather use the 'sum of carcasses' in each season for each year. However, that will result in one value for each subgroup.
As a back-up plan, are there any alternatives for nested anova?
I hope some could shed some light on this matter.
Many thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Nick
At the moment, I'm trying to do a 'Nested Anova'. I have several years (2004 to 2012) and four seasons. So a nested anova is called for correct?
I'm looking at carcass data. My dataset consists of the amount of carcasses found every 10 days. There are a lot of zero values, as I expect higher mortality (at the end) in certain seasons. Anova compares the means of each group, but I think that the 'mean found carcasses' is not really suitable (especially because of the many zero values). I would rather use the 'sum of carcasses' in each season for each year. However, that will result in one value for each subgroup.
As a back-up plan, are there any alternatives for nested anova?
I hope some could shed some light on this matter.
Many thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Nick