Just checking my thinking - if we had two models for 12 experimental cases.
Model 1 has 10 parameters, and accounts for 95% of variance
Model 2 has 2 parameters, and accounts for 90% of the variance
- If we replicated the study and predicted scores from each model, which model would be more accurate?
I think that model 2 will be more accurate as a predictor, Even though there is less variance accounted for, the model is simpler and therefore less constrained by losses of degrees of freedom and has less chance of a type 1 error due to a smaller amount of parameters.
Would you agree?
Model 1 has 10 parameters, and accounts for 95% of variance
Model 2 has 2 parameters, and accounts for 90% of the variance
- If we replicated the study and predicted scores from each model, which model would be more accurate?
I think that model 2 will be more accurate as a predictor, Even though there is less variance accounted for, the model is simpler and therefore less constrained by losses of degrees of freedom and has less chance of a type 1 error due to a smaller amount of parameters.
Would you agree?