Recent content by hlsmith

Well if I was eligible, but didn't redeem it or initiate a service - I am obviously not like those that did. Perhaps I didn't actually need it or that I was so poor off that I never had the resources to follow-up getting it. So the groups may not be exchangeable. So if you knew additional...

TL:DR - are the models nested?

@Buckeye he mentions 'controlling' for categorical variables in this, but not using them. I have another resource I will post when I come across it again!

Well if we don't have all the inquiry details, we can't yet says any of this content is off-topic.

Relevant resource for GAMs.

One comment. have you already collected your data? Post hoc power calculations are considered a fax paus and frowned upon, since you likely already found a potential difference. Thus there is a form of selection bias going on. Since if the two proportions were null, you wouldn't move forward!

Welcome to the Forum @bhavneesh. I love biostatistics. We look forward to your questions and contributions.

My one question is, what kind of food? Non-perishable? I would capitalized "Collection" as well.

abstract art meets innumeracy. Beautiful!!!

Uncapitalized first letter of axes labels, which drive me mad!

Are these like the weighing stations?

Can you post the exact original question in its entirety! Have you covered the Poisson distribution in class?

Not following what this is, "reduction to damage to the road and safety violations from increasing the number of inspectors?" Law enforcement agents or people that go out and inspect bridges?

I think literature may be more robust if you call this loss-to-follow-up, which falls under selection bias. If you can get a random sample of these individuals there can be weighting or Bayesian methods to correct for it.

You gotta tell us where these data are from to better help us figure out things or tell you if a process already exists. That and I kinda want to make sure this isn't some wonky conspiratory hoax, like numbers in the bible.