From Dr Anna Nahmally's files...
A veteran pollster notes that in Election 2020, “Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton [in 2016] in every major metro area around the country,
save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia [
see previous post] ... Robert Barnes, the foremost election analyst, observes in these '
big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.'” Surprisingly, Biden also garnered more popular votes than Obama did during his historic 2008 election, against a weak GOP candidate (11/8).
Do you believe in ‘magic’..?
....
A rational sleuth looks at
the odd vote-count patterns in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia, using metrics of 1) the difference in absolute vote counts for Biden and Trump (X-Y), and 2) the
log-
ratio of vote counts -- X/Y -- for Biden and Trump (11/24):
Ratios allow us to spot a potential sign of fraud ... because those who watch and participate in elections tend not to think in these terms, if there is fraud, they’re much less likely to have covered their tracks in this respect.
…
This election represents an extraordinary and unique opportunity for election integrity analysts and the application of statistical fraud detection research, as it is likely the first national election in American history, at the very least, where the general public has had access to time-series election data.

[Chart annotated for clarity]
BOTTOM LINE: The four most-anomalous 'data dumps' in the wee hours after Election 2020 provided the margin of Electoral victory.
....
Statistical analysis of
Michigan absentee votes seem to suggest computer manipulation (11/27). In addition to the unlikely high Biden/Trump ratio of absentee votes in certain areas, the striking differences in D-vs-R support in comparing the 2016 and 2020 elections, the inclusion of 227K ballots sent and received on the same day, ballots from 117 year-olds, etc etc … in counties bordering Detroit, the ratios of absentee ballots for Biden and Trump -- which should be somewhat independent metrics -- were strangely consistent across voting precinct in 2020:

[Chart annotated for clarity]
Meanwhile in Pennsylvania...
Having trailed Trump almost 1-to-2 during in-person Election Day voting,
Biden garnered an over 3-to-1 advantage in absentee ballots, or about a 6X turnaround in relative support (11/30). Across political affiliations, Biden’s tally vs Trump in absentee ballots was reportedly 19-to-1 among Democrats and 4-to-1 among Independents … Joe even garnered an unlikely 21% of Republican mail-in ballots, despite PA exit polls of GOP voters favoring Biden at only 8%. (Apparently, the
mail-it-in strategy of Biden's subterranean 'referendum' campaign paid off.) Additionally, in 2016, mail-in ballots in PA had a rejection rate of around 1% ... while in 2020, almost 10X as many mail-in ballots were submitted, but had a rejection rate of only 0.04%, or 1/27th that of 2016. This is despite the
FiveThirtyEight estimate that
first-time absentee-voter ballots generally have a rejection rate 3X those of experienced mail-in voters ... 'tis all such a mystery.
Meanwhile in Nothing-to-See-Here non-news...
Hey, this wacky connection is amazingly coincidental, but hasn’t been picked up by the American mainstream media: A month before Election 2020,
the Chinese government may have bought for $400 million a controlling interest in Dominion Voting Systems, the manufacturers of the controversial voting machines, with suspect proprietary software, used in battleground states (12/1;
more here from another fringe source). Of course,
our prestige MSM had better things to do in October than uncover this unimportant minutiae.
In more totally coincidental
N2SH non-news,
Kamala Harris’s official photographer is conveniently also a Dominion technician and vote-counter in Georgia (11/29), which “
creates a massive conflict of interest that violates state election law”. Well, duh, but certainly not in a newsworthy way.
Well, what do you know …
media bias and censorship really work! (11/24) From a survey of Biden voters in Election 2020 battleground states...

Both Pfizer and Moderna delayed their reporting of very promising COVID-vaccine progress until after Election Day (12/6). Pfizer actually shut down its lab work to avoid the required reporting protocol, while Moderna of France was told that they needed more test data on minority subjects.
-----------[ WAIT ... THERE'S MORE!!! ]------------
Knowing that future historians and statisticians will look back at the awesome incredibility of Election 2020, Dr Anna Nahmally savors insightful perspectives from earlier times ... such as from 1814, when
Pierre-Simon Laplace argued that
The more extraordinary the event, the greater the need of its being supported by strong proofs, and
The probability of the falsehood increases in the measure that the deed becomes more extraordinary, and
The probability of the error or of the falsehood of the witness becomes as much greater as the fact attested is more extraordinary, and finally
There are things so extraordinary that nothing can balance their improbability.
Leaving aside contentious granular aspects of Election 2020 (see all, above), give LaPlace’s intellectual exercise a spin on
this could-happen-to-anyone home-safety anecdote (12/3): "President-elect Joe Biden on Thursday revealed that he
broke his foot tripping on a rug after a shower as he chased one of his dogs and grabbed its tail". Meanwhile, Kamala sees
an opportunity to puppy-up.
-----------[ WAIT ... THERE'S MORE!!! ]------------
Although Election 2020 was incredibly squeaky clean -- ask anyone in the media -- and any suggestions otherwise are
conspiratorial crazytalk, worthy of social-media ban ...
here’s what you need to do to rig an election (12/1), totally hypothetically, of course.
x