I am currently writing my thesis for an MSc in Sport Performance. My data collection involved running my participants through 5 different warm-up protocols (including baseline) and testing them in 3 different ways - stride to sprint times, jog to sprint times and agility times.
I ran three one-way ANOVAs, one for each of the tests. All obeyed Mauchly's test of sphericity, and all returned non significant results, indicating that the null hypotheses cannot be rejected.
My university's notes are unclear as to how to proceed. Do I just say "Well, results were not significantly different for each test after exposure to each warm up protocol, here's why I think that may be" or do I look for more subtle trends in the data? Is there any post-hoc work to be done at all?
Thanks
P.S. was using 3 separate one-way ANOVAs even appropriate?
I ran three one-way ANOVAs, one for each of the tests. All obeyed Mauchly's test of sphericity, and all returned non significant results, indicating that the null hypotheses cannot be rejected.
My university's notes are unclear as to how to proceed. Do I just say "Well, results were not significantly different for each test after exposure to each warm up protocol, here's why I think that may be" or do I look for more subtle trends in the data? Is there any post-hoc work to be done at all?
Thanks
P.S. was using 3 separate one-way ANOVAs even appropriate?