Hi there,
I have a question regarding univariate GLM models. I have entered in three factors and as a covariates and asked for estimated means comparisons. I wasn't interested in interactions at first, I just wanted to see (a) one of my factors predicted the DV and (b) if my estimated means were different for those factors. I ran all those models a while ago (I have 15 models), and I was just redoing them and asking for the ETA squared as I realized I need to report it, but asking for this changes what I am getting in my main corrected model in terms of main effects.
Well, I reran this and found my results change when I ask for the ETA squared The factor that was initially significant in the corrected model section no longer was and other factors were. Can anyone explain why? Did I go from simply comparing estimated means to a full regression model? I am just not sure how asking for those would change my entire corrected model.
Can someone clarify this issue?
Thanks!
A
I have a question regarding univariate GLM models. I have entered in three factors and as a covariates and asked for estimated means comparisons. I wasn't interested in interactions at first, I just wanted to see (a) one of my factors predicted the DV and (b) if my estimated means were different for those factors. I ran all those models a while ago (I have 15 models), and I was just redoing them and asking for the ETA squared as I realized I need to report it, but asking for this changes what I am getting in my main corrected model in terms of main effects.
Well, I reran this and found my results change when I ask for the ETA squared The factor that was initially significant in the corrected model section no longer was and other factors were. Can anyone explain why? Did I go from simply comparing estimated means to a full regression model? I am just not sure how asking for those would change my entire corrected model.
Can someone clarify this issue?
Thanks!
A
Last edited: